Instant Checkmate
Criminal-record and social-profile search option.
View Records Sponsored partner optionPublic access starts with the court that owns the case. Federal cases use the federal judiciary’s PACER system; state and local cases use the applicable judiciary or clerk, and public visibility can vary by case type.
Classify the case as federal or state/local, identify the court, then use the court’s own case number and docket as the verification layer.
For public access to court records, identify whether the case is federal or state/local and search the system maintained by that judiciary. Use PACER for federal cases. For state or local matters, use the official court portal or clerk, and treat access restrictions as part of the record rather than assuming a blank online search means no case.
The first routing decision prevents most false no-results.
A case can be public without every document being remotely available.
| Access level | What you may see | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| Online index | Basic parties, case number, dates or docket summary | Open the case in the owning court system. |
| Online document | A public filing image or order | Confirm it belongs to the correct docket event. |
| Courthouse terminal / clerk | Records not exposed remotely | Use the court’s inspection or copy process. |
| Restricted / confidential | Limited or no public access | Do not infer the hidden contents. |
Use identifiers and docket events rather than a name match alone.
Court transparency operates alongside privacy and confidentiality rules.
Federal and state judiciaries publish large amounts of case information, but the systems have different coverage. PACER is federal only. State portals may expose indexes, summaries, images, or only selected case types. The appropriate clerk remains important when the public record exists but the online interface does not provide the needed document.
A correct search result should also preserve the access boundary. Sealed filings, confidential case types, redacted personal identifiers, or records available only at a courthouse should not be described as missing facts. Report what the official system actually exposes and, where necessary, direct the next step to the court that owns the file.